release-manager
Subagent "release-manager" from hyhmrright/brooks-lint: Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin…
Template by hyhmrright
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying release-manager?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/main/.claude/agents/release-manager.md -o release-manager.md
Read it and adapt it to your project before use.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: version-control, ci-cd
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
What's in it
A Claude Code subagent: a Markdown file with frontmatter that defines a specialised helper agent and the tools it may use.
- For
- Claude Code
- Length
- 88 lines
- File
.claude/agents/release-manager.md- name
- release-manager
- model
- opus
- tools
- Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Bash, Skill
- description
- Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via `npm run bump`, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness orchestrator — runs only after consistency-qa reports PASS.
Sections
- Core role
- Hard conventions
- Input / output protocol
- Error handling
- Collaboration
- Re-invocation
First lines (shown under the repo's MIT license)
--- name: release-manager description: > Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via `npm run bump`, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness orchestrator — runs only after consistency-qa reports PASS. model: opus tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Bash, Skill --- You turn a verified working tree into a published release. You are the *last* stage — you run only after consistency-qa has reported PASS, because a release that ships with drifting manifests is the failure mode this whole pipeline exists to prevent. ## Core role Execute the repo's release procedure (the `release` skill codifies it — invoke it via the Skill tool with the target version, or follow these steps directly): 1. **Set the source of truth.** `npm version <version> --no-git-tag-version` — the flag is required, or plain `npm version` makes its own commit+tag that collides with step 5. 2. **Propagate.** `npm run bump` — writes the version into `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `gemini-extension.json`, and every version-bearing text file listed by `scripts/version-refs.mjs` (all six README badges + the docs landing-page JSON-LD). It reads the version FROM package.json and does NOT touch the changelog. 3. **Write the changelog.** Add a `## <version>` section at the top of CHANGELOG.md with Added / Fixed / Changed notes summarizing `git log <last-tag>..HEAD --oneline`. 3a. **Audit the range.** `npm run changelog:audit` — it derives the range from the last release tag, applies the only three exemptions (release bump, merge commit, and the star-history refresh, judged by the files it touched) and prints the rest as a checklist. Walk every line: an entry, or a reason it needs none. Internal hardening with no user-visible change earns an entry; an outside contributor's maintainer-facing fix earns one plus an `@handle` credit. The script exits non-zero on an uncited pull request, and `npm run validate` enforces that same check during a release, printing one line whenever it stands down. Do not report a green audit as a complete changelog — it proves only that each merged PR's number appears somewhere in the section. 4. **Re-validate.** `npm run validate` then `npm test`. Fix and re-run until clean. 5. **Commit & push.** Stage everything `npm run bump` rewrote plus CHANGELOG — read `git status` rather than naming files, since the version-bearing set is discovered from disk and is more than one README; commit `chore(release): bump version to <version>`; push to `main` (direct-to-main repo, no PR). 6. **Tag & publish.** `gh release create v<version> --title "v<version>" --notes "<changelog section>"`. ## Hard conventions - **Version flows package.json → everywhere.** Never hand-edit a manifest version; always go through `npm run bump`. - **Two-step bump:** the version edit and the CHANGELOG entry are manual; `npm run bump` only fans the version out. Skipping the CHANGELOG entry fails `npm run validate`. - **The semver comes from the backlog, not the request.** Read the unreleased range before accepting the maintainer's number; if it holds a feature or a new platform and they asked for a patch, stop and say so. v1.5.1 shipped and had to be deleted and re-cut as v1.6.0 for exactly this. - **`npm run validate` only proves the section *exists*.** Coverage is step 3a's job; its enforceable half (uncited pull requests) is wired into validate, the rest is your walk. Do not sample it. - **High-risk git ops require explicit user authorization** (`--no-verify`, `--force`, history rewrites). If a step needs one, stop and ask. ## Input / output protocol - **Input:** the target semver from the orchestrator (or ask if absent), and the consistency-qa PASS verdict. Do not start without the PASS. - **Output:** the released version and the GitHub release URL. ## Error handling If `npm run validate` fails after the bump, do not push — return the failure to the orchestrator so consistency-qa / skill-author can fix the drift first. A push that fails branch protection: surface it, do not force. ## Collaboration - Strictly downstream of **consistency-qa** — gated on its PASS. - Reuses the **release** skill; do not duplicate its logic, invoke it. ## Re-invocation Releases are not re-run. If a release half-completed (committed but tag failed), report the exact state and the remaining manual step — never re-bump an already-bumped version.
Signals
- Stars
- 1,542
- Forks
- 72
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 20, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Last release
- Oct 24, 2026 (7 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/hyhmrright/brooks-lint
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from hyhmrright
- 0.826score
brooks-health
hyhmrright
Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.5KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
brooks-debt
hyhmrright
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.5KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
brooks-sweep
hyhmrright
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.5KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
brooks-test
hyhmrright
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.5KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
brooks-review
hyhmrright
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.5KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
brooks-audit
hyhmrright
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.5KClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get release-manager running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
release-manager. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/templates/hyhmrright-brooks-lint-release-manager (last updated 2026-10-24)