Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

qa

General-purpose QA verdict for any artifact type

Skill by Q00

IndexedMIT★ 6,269
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying qa?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/q00-qa

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

General-purpose QA verdict for any artifact type

Use cases: testing, code-review

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/qa

What's inside

Skill name
qa
Description
General-purpose QA verdict for any artifact type
License
MIT
Instructions
72 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# /ouroboros:qa

Fast single-pass quality verdict with actionable suggestions for any artifact: code, documents, API responses, test output, or custom content. For formal three-stage verification of an execution, use `ooo evaluate`.

```
ooo qa [file_path | artifact_text]
ooo qa                                     # recent execution output
/ouroboros:qa [file_path | artifact_text]
```

The QA Judge scores the artifact against a quality bar on Correctness, Completeness, Quality, Intent Alignment, and Domain-Specific dimensions:

| Score | Verdict | Loop action |
|-------|---------|-------------|
| >= 0.80 | PASS | done |
| 0.40 - 0.79 | REVISE | continue |
| < 0.40 | FAIL | escalate |

## Instructions

### Loading MCP tools (deferred-schema guard)

Ouroboros tools may be deferred, and a schema loaded on one turn can unload by the next. Immediately before each `ouroboros_*` call, load it with the active runtime's tool-discovery capability: `"+ouroboros qa"` for `ouroboros_qa`. A call whose schema is not loaded fails with "Invalid tool parameters". If the tool is already callable, discovery is a no-op and an empty result is expected. Use the fallback only when the tool is genuinely absent; this skill works without MCP setup.

### QA steps

1. **Artifact**: a file path (read it with the active runtime's `inspect_code` capability), inline text, or else the most recent execution output; ask with `ask_user` if unclear.
2. **Quality bar**: the Seed's acceptance criteria when a Seed is in context, else the user's stated bar; otherwise ask "What does 'good' mean for this artifact?"
3. **Artifact type**: `code`, `test_output`, `document`, `api_response`, `screenshot`, or `custom`.

3.5. **Acting verification fan-out** (behavior-bearing artifacts): a text judge can be fooled by a hopeful log line. Use the active runtime's `orchestrate_subagents` capability to launch, together, one probe child per acting modality the runtime exposes: a process probe (`run_shell`: run the command or app or smoke commands with bounded timeouts, capture exit codes and real output), a browser probe (HTTP services and web UIs: load them, exercise the primary flows, capture rendering and console/network errors), a computer-use probe (GUI/TUI: drive it like a user, screenshot observed states), and an artifact probe (`inspect_code`: declared files exist with real content, not placeholders). Each probe returns structured evidence only (commands, observed effects, screenshots/paths, pass/fail per behavior) and covers the applicable adversarial classes the QA tool lists. Skip a modality only when its tools are absent or it is meaningless for the artifact, and say which were skipped and why. Await all probes and pass the merged evidence as `reference`; prefer observed behavior over source text as the `artifact` when they disagree.

4. **Call the tool**:
   ```
   Tool: ouroboros_qa
   Arguments:
     artifact: <the content to evaluate>
     quality_bar: <what 'pass' means>
     artifact_type: "code"  (or other type)
     reference: <observed-behaviour evidence from step 3.5, plus any reference>
     pass_threshold: 0.80  (adjustable)
     seed_content: <seed YAML if available>
   ```

   **Plugin delegation**: a response with `status: "delegated_to_subagent"` and `dispatch_mode: "plugin"` carries no verdict. Its content is the bridge's dispatch notice and its `_subagent` prompt is the child's input, never a result. Keep `qa_session_id`, await the plugin-spawned child, and parse its JSON verdict (`score`, `verdict`, `dimensions`, `differences`, `suggestions`, `reasoning`). No `iteration_entry` comes back, so derive the loop action as the tool does (score >= `pass_threshold`: done; >= 0.40: continue; else escalate) and build the entry yourself (`iteration`, `score`, `verdict`, `loop_action`). If the child returns no parseable verdict, say so instead of presenting the envelope.

5. **Present** the score and verdict prominently, then dimension scores, specific differences, and actionable suggestions. **Empirical evidence outranks the judge**: if the judge scores PASS but a probe observed the behavior failing, present REVISE/FAIL on that evidence and say so. If nothing could act, flag that behavior was not observed. Pick the next action from the verdict:
   - **PASS (done)**: proceed; the artifact meets the quality bar
   - **REVISE (continue)**: address the suggestions, then run `ooo qa` again
   - **FAIL (escalate)**: `ooo interview` to re-examine requirements, or `ooo unstuck` to challenge assumptions

### Iterative QA

The first call returns `qa_session_id` and `iteration_entry` in meta. On later calls pass `qa_session_id` and the accumulated `iteration_history`. Continue until the verdict is `pass` or `fail`.

### Fallback (no Ouroboros MCP server)

Adopt the `qa-judge` role yourself with the same prompt the MCP tool uses: `$OUROBOROS_AGENTS_DIR/qa-judge.md` when that override is set; else the installed package's copy, printed with `run_shell`:

```bash
uvx --isolated --python '>=3.12' --from ouroboros-ai python -c "import importlib.resources as r, sys; print(r.files('ouroboros.agents').joinpath(sys.argv[1]).read_text(encoding='utf-8'))" qa-judge.md
```

else `src/ouroboros/agents/qa-judge.md` in a source checkout.

If none is reachable, judge on the dimensions and thresholds above and label the verdict as an unaligned fallback. Run the step 3.5 probes first for behavior-bearing artifacts, render the verdict in the same shape the MCP tool returns (score, verdict, threshold, dimensions, differences, suggestions, reasoning, loop action), and keep the iterative contract with a `qa-<uuid4_short>` session id and an iteration count held in the conversation.

## RFC #1392 State Breadcrumb Footer

End the final response with exactly one line `◆ <current state> → next: <recommended action>`. Derive the state from live session state via `ouroboros_session_status` when available, otherwise from this skill's actual outcome. Never use a linear `Step N of M` footer; when the next step is a real choice, list 2-3 options.

From Q00/ouroboros, MIT.

More from Q00/ouroboros

Signals

Stars
6,269
Forks
634
Open issues
74
Contributors
96
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 16, 2026 (15 days ago)
Last release
Oct 23, 2026 (7 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from Q00

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get qa running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying qa?

CallGet help
Cite this page

qa skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/q00-qa (last updated 2026-10-24)